Software Quality Assurance Practice Exam

What is one effective technique in error reporting?

1. Only focus on fixing surface-level symptoms of errors.

2. Use code inspection only after implementing changes.

3. Ensure error corrections are comprehensively tested in the original program.

4. Document errors but do not analyze them.

The correct answer is: Ensure error corrections are comprehensively tested in the original program.

Focusing on ensuring that error corrections are comprehensively tested in the original program is crucial for maintaining software quality. This practice allows developers to verify that not only is the specific error resolved, but also that the fix does not introduce any new issues or regressions in the existing functionality. Comprehensive testing may involve unit tests, integration tests, and system tests that are designed to cover both the corrected errors and any related components that could be impacted. This approach helps to maintain the integrity of the software, as it validates the effectiveness of the fixes implemented. Furthermore, it emphasizes the importance of a rigorous quality assurance process, ensuring that all changes are reliable and contribute to the overall stability of the application. By implementing comprehensive testing alongside error correction, teams can create a more resilient software product, ultimately leading to higher user satisfaction and lower maintenance costs over time. In contrast, the other options do not support effective error reporting and the improvement of software quality. For instance, concentrating solely on surface-level symptoms neglects the root causes of errors, and delaying code inspections until after changes can lead to unresolved issues. Additionally, documenting errors without analysis misses the opportunity to learn from mistakes and improve future error handling.